Re: FPGA
- From: "Bob" <nimby_NEEDSPAM@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 21 Nov 2006 22:07:59 -0800
"Adam" <angeladam06@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1164157502.257716.111220@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
to bob n keith.. you might want to check here
http://groups.google.com.my/group/comp.arch.fpga/browse_thread/thread/4d189cdaa14ae22e/8aa2874bd1551e9e?lnk=st&q=fpga+awa&rnum=1&hl=en#8aa2874bd1551e9e
stop thiking you know lots when you don't..
The original post was:
"Does anyone knows why FPGA is said to have problem with low level
programming module?"
What in the HELL does that mean? Add some words. Give us a clue. Throw us a
fricking bone.
I've worked with FPGAs and processors for many years -- from the Xilinx 2018
FPGA and the Z80 CPU to Virtex-5 FPGAs and Turion CPUs. I have no idea what
that question means. I don't think anyone else does, either.
Bob
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: FPGA
- From: Adam
- Re: FPGA
- Prev by Date: Re: a good PC?
- Next by Date: Re: PID question
- Previous by thread: Re: FPGA
- Next by thread: Re: FPGA
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|