Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- From: Ignoramus31174 <ignoramus31174@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 25 Nov 2006 23:44:29 +0000 (UTC)
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 22:14:00 +0000, Chris Jones <lugnut808@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Ignoramus31174 wrote:
On Sat, 25 Nov 2006 05:53:03 GMT, Homer J Simpson <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"Ignoramus7040" <ignoramus7040@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g57pj.ral.17.1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do you mean something as pictured in Figure 6? What would be the
point, to turn current on and off like that? Or are you suggesting
high frequency switching? I would rather regulate it, that is my
first, unstudied thought, than switch on and off? I apologize if
my comment is off base.
The point is to handle large currents without large heat losses. SCRs
were used for such tasks before large transistors or FETs were common.
One use was as a speed control for a battery golf cart. Basically you
fire the first SCR to turn the current on. At a certain point you fire
another SCR across it with a capacitor in series. This shunts the first
SCR which turns off and the capacitor then charges and turns the second
SCR off. Then repeat.
A more modern design might have transistors cycling on and off to control
the current with lower heat losses than remaining on. Basically this is a
form of switch mode power supply, perhaps without the transformer and
Schottky diodes.
As I say, it depends on how much current you want to use for electro
plating. 50 A at 12 V drop (say) is mighty hot.
OK, I see now. 50 A at 12V is not that much -- it is just 500
watts. Nothing that a 10 inch long heatsink could not handle. I have a
heatsink with 2 transistors assembly, would be nice to try to make it
into a variable voltage limited and current limited supply using them.
i
If you are thinking of any kind of switching regulator, and given that you
have low voltage DC already, I would definitely avoid SCRs since they
always drop quite a lot of voltage and are difficult to turn off. I would
either use MOSFETs in a switching constant current source, or get a big
heatsink with a fan, and build a linear regulator with either NPN bipolar
transistors or MOSFETs. The switching regulator would be more intersting
and more efficient, and an inductor to handle 50A DC could probably be
scavenged / built up from some computer power supply parts.
Chris, you know me. I am basically looking to see what would it entail
to make the cheapest/easiest solution to making a more versatile power
supply out of this PP-1104B/G. If the power converter is lossy, I
think that in the end it is not a huge consideration.
Is it true that a linear transistor based regulator is basically an
extremely simple solution?
i
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- From: Ignoramus31174
- Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- References:
- Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- From: Ignoramus7040
- Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- From: Homer J Simpson
- Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- From: Ignoramus7040
- Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- From: Homer J Simpson
- Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- From: Ignoramus7040
- Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- From: Homer J Simpson
- Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- From: Ignoramus31174
- Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- From: Chris Jones
- Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- Prev by Date: Re: not a new subject - women in electronics and computing?
- Next by Date: Re: not a new subject - women in electronics and computing?
- Previous by thread: Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- Next by thread: Re: Diode reverse protection and current limiting.
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|