Re: How inaccurate is a 555 or 7555 REALLY?

On 4 Dec 2006 17:19:45 -0800, bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:


John Fields wrote:
On 3 Dec 2006 15:10:27 -0800, bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:

My own idea of my
attitude on this news group is "polite until provoked"

---
Which generally manifests itself as provocation = disagreement.
---

but John Larkin
does keep on finding insults in my posts that I could have sworn
weren't there when I composed them (and don't look much like insults to
me when I reread them).

---
Which is about the double standard you exact. If, in fact, your
posts are made without rancor, which is ridiculous on its face, you
insist that what must then be "carelessness" on your part be not
interpreted as insult, but that infinite care be taken with
correspondence directed to you in order that you not interpret it as
insult.
---

Of course, if you could find an example where I was unreasonably easily
provoked, or "accidentally" produced a grievous insult, you'd quote it,
thus converting a pointless troll into something worth reading.

---
Just because I can't be bothered to slog through the morass of your
posting history in order to find an example of your nasty attitude
certainly doesn't mean there aren't thousands of examples out there.
---

Phil Allison would blame this on autism, but he
blames a lot of stuff on autism. He's not an expert psychologist,
unlike my wife's academic colleagues (who won't use me as a test
subject any more, because I know too much).

---
More than likely that's what they tell you in order to dismiss you
gracefully and to keep from hurting your wife, to whom you must
certainly be an embarrassment.

If you say so John - since you don't know my wife or her colleagues,
you are free to let your imagination run wild. Pity you haven't got an
imagination that can usefully exploit this lack of factual restraint,
let alone any more modern electronic component than the 555.

---
It's true that I don't know them, but knowing _you_ is enough to
know how they'd behave if they were nice people who had to but up
with an overbearing know-it-all like you.

I'm working on a project right now where I'm using an MC68HC908JL8.
And you?

Still hanging on to that pig-ignorant belief that a 555 is a "bad"
chip which no one should use because you won't? Even when it's the
perfect candidate for the job?


--
JF
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: How inaccurate is a 555 or 7555 REALLY?
    ... John Fields wrote: ... interpreted as insult, but that infinite care be taken with ... posting history in order to find an example of your nasty attitude ... what would _you_ know about serious electronics? ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: How inaccurate is a 555 or 7555 REALLY?
    ... John Fields wrote: ... interpreted as insult, but that infinite care be taken with ... posting history in order to find an example of your nasty attitude ... what would _you_ know about serious electronics? ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: How inaccurate is a 555 or 7555 REALLY?
    ... John Fields wrote: ... interpreted as insult, but that infinite care be taken with ... posting history in order to find an example of your nasty attitude ... job in serious electronics these days. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Way off topic question
    ... you explain *why* I have a bad attitude. ... Google and give you a kitchen table synopsis..but Im afraid that my ... tendency to call a spade a spade my tend to piss you off. ... probably wouldn't have hurled an insult at my family like you did. ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: How inaccurate is a 555 or 7555 REALLY?
    ... John Fields wrote: ... interpreted as insult, but that infinite care be taken with ... If you say so John - since you don't know my wife or her colleagues, ... you are free to let your imagination run wild. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)