Re: How inaccurate is a 555 or 7555 REALLY?

On 6 Dec 2006 21:47:32 -0800, bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:


John Fields wrote:
On 5 Dec 2006 23:54:43 -0800, bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx wrote:

---
Instead of conjecture and invective, do you have any numbers which
would contradict his claim?

I couldn't find any numbers to supplement his single number - which, of
itself, isn't all that informative.

I notice that you haven't any information to add on the historical
trends in 555 use,

---
That's right, but neither am I making claims, as you are.
---

apart from your personal conviction that it is the
greatest thing since sliced bread.

---
Wrong again. I think the greatest thing since sliced bread is the
microcontroller. The 555 is a nice little chip with a huge
application base and phenomenal sales and lifetime.



--
JF
.

Quantcast