Re: Please clarify European resistor value notation for me

On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 17:02:35 GMT, Joerg
<notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Jim Thompson wrote:

On Fri, 08 Dec 2006 08:22:00 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

[snip]

The debate over US/european/tibetan schematic symbols is silly. We
just make up anything that we like. Why follow rules when you can make
rules?


[snip]


Same here... very human-readable schematics, but netlists are what the
layout guys want.


I became very careful about that. Basically my layouter re-draws the
schematic most of the time. That takes a few extra hours but it's well
invested time.

Sometimes my layout guy recreates a schematic in his tool format...
particularly if he's an employee of the foundry who want their own
documentation.

However I insist of LVS checking against MY netlist ;-)


The pinout on even the most mundane parts such as a BSS123 is not
standard. At first the layouter didn't think so until it did go wrong.
Data*** said 3-1-2, his CAD said 1-3-2. Bzzzzt. What blew me away was
that they even changed it when Siemens became Infineon. IOW there is no
standard.

I don't have that problem... at least not very often... it's rare that
I do a discrete project as I am at the moment.

...Jim Thompson
--
| James E.Thompson, P.E. | mens |
| Analog Innovations, Inc. | et |
| Analog/Mixed-Signal ASIC's and Discrete Systems | manus |
| Phoenix, Arizona Voice:(480)460-2350 | |
| E-mail Address at Website Fax:(480)460-2142 | Brass Rat |
| http://www.analog-innovations.com | 1962 |

I love to cook with wine. Sometimes I even put it in the food.
.

Loading