Re: receiving a carrier
- From: John Fields <jfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:11:03 -0800
On Thu, 21 Dec 2006 15:44:49 -0700, Donald <Donald@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
John Fields wrote:
On 21 Dec 2006 13:14:57 -0800, "jhon1" <aomarenator@xxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
Hello Donald
Thanks for your message, my clock signal has a frequency of 100 Mhz, so
I think it is very difficult to be transmitted with available radio
modules, so I suppose that if I send a high frequency carrier (sine
wave 100Mhz), and be able to receive it at the second point and then
convert it to square wave ,this will be a good option
thanks
---
I'm surprised that no one has asked you to bottom post and inline
post when necessary, so I will. Please bottom post and inline post
when necessary. Thank you.
John,
Its very nice of you to keep everyone on their toes.
But, the discussion procedded nicely without bitching about top vs
bottom posting.
---
And without your bitching about my "bitching" about bottom posting I
might mention.
The custom here is to bottom post, and for good reason, since a new
entrant to a thread (like me) will have to traverse all of the
posts in a jumpy fashion order to determine what's going on.
---
Make you wonder if it really matters.
---
No it doesn't make _me_ wonder at all. It matters.
Even Google says not to bottom post and, yet, our OP chooses to be a
bottom poster while being a Google Grouper. Makes one wonder,
doesn't it?
--
JF
.
- References:
- receiving a carrier
- From: jhon1
- Re: receiving a carrier
- From: jhon1
- Re: receiving a carrier
- From: Michael Black
- Re: receiving a carrier
- From: jhon1
- Re: receiving a carrier
- From: Donald
- Re: receiving a carrier
- From: jhon1
- Re: receiving a carrier
- From: John Fields
- Re: receiving a carrier
- From: Donald
- receiving a carrier
- Prev by Date: Re: Christmas Lights Problem
- Next by Date: Re: Christmas Lights Problem
- Previous by thread: Re: receiving a carrier
- Next by thread: Re: receiving a carrier
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
