Re: Design of process control timer
- From: "JeffM" <jeffm_@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 8 Jan 2007 09:16:57 -0800
venkatsr wrote:
i have to use a 555 timer.A simpler circuit which is easy to design.
On Usenet, it is traditional to include CONTEXT in your followup post:
http://66.102.9.104/search?q=cache:SXIajvWUVHAJ:groups.google.com/support/bin/answer.py=answer=12348+Tempting-though-it-is-*-*-*-*-*-*+remove-*-*-*-irrelevant+STOP+zz+zz+Summarize.what.you're.following.up+BOTTOM+qq+Usenet
Why don't you just include the email address of your instructor?
We can skip 1 step and send him the answer directly.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Design of process control timer
- From: Don Lancaster
- Re: Design of process control timer
- References:
- Design of process control timer
- From: venkatsr
- Re: Design of process control timer
- From: mkaras
- Re: Design of process control timer
- From: venkatsr
- Design of process control timer
- Prev by Date: Re: Copper pour or traces?
- Next by Date: Re: desing for high strength RF immunity
- Previous by thread: Re: Design of process control timer
- Next by thread: Re: Design of process control timer
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|