Re: TDR, VNA and FFT...
- From: Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 13 Jan 2007 17:56:05 GMT
Fred Bartoli wrote:
Joerg a écrit :
Bob wrote:
"Fred Bartoli" <fred._canxxxel_this_bartoli@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message news:45a6c38e$0$292$426a34cc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Seems simple at first sight.
Apply a sine wave to the DUT through R=Zo
Multiply voltage by 1/(j w)
Take inverse FFT.
The outcome is... uhhh
I must have overlooked something, but what?
...going to bed. Maybe I'll do better tomorrow.
--
Thanks,
Fred.
What are you trying to do?
There is something called frequency domain reflectometry but, with that, you need to sweep the DUT through a range of frequencies.
Yeah, but what's wrong with good old TDR? It's simple and it works.
Yeah, simple, but try to obtain precision on a 5km line while still having the communication link working with big data signal on the TDR side, and also decent aquisition time.
Yeah, but you didn't say that in you post :-)
Other "neat" equipment monitoring features provided almost for free by the VNA.
If the channel has to keep running TDR might indeed not be such a cool option. Except if you could use syncs or certain other features in the signal as a "TDR pulse".
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com
.
- References:
- TDR, VNA and FFT...
- From: Fred Bartoli
- Re: TDR, VNA and FFT...
- From: Bob
- Re: TDR, VNA and FFT...
- From: Joerg
- Re: TDR, VNA and FFT...
- From: Fred Bartoli
- TDR, VNA and FFT...
- Prev by Date: Re: reg: course
- Next by Date: Re: Windows Vista - worst OS yet?
- Previous by thread: Re: TDR, VNA and FFT...
- Next by thread: Re: TDR, VNA and FFT...
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|