Re: searching better alternative for LM386
- From: "Tom" <tomtorfs@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 18 Jan 2007 06:30:00 -0800
Tim,
So, basically I'm looking for a better audio amp, similar to the LM386
but with lower noise.
Classic answer for "more power than a LM386" is a LM383,
I didn't ask for "more power than an LM386", I asked for lower noise.
but there's ZERO reason for putting this much power into headphones.
As I clarified in my later post to Phil the high power pulses are only
for very brief periods of time.
The audio power level given to the patients is decided by the doctors,
not by me. My device just has to able to support the specified maximum
range: 105 dB nHL, which corresponds to something on the order of 140
dB RMS SPL, depending on frequency and toneburst shape.
Currently they are doing the same thing with big wall-powered devices,
I'm merely implementing the same functionality (with the same
specifications) in a portable battery-powered design.
LM4881 is very worthwhile as a headphone amp, plenty of power, much
less noise than a LM386.
Thanks for the suggestion, I'll look into it.
greetings,
Tom
.
- Follow-Ups:
- BEWARE: Tom = Dangerous IDIOT
- From: Phil Allison
- Re: searching better alternative for LM386
- From: Tim Shoppa
- Re: searching better alternative for LM386
- From: ian field
- BEWARE: Tom = Dangerous IDIOT
- References:
- searching better alternative for LM386
- From: Tom
- Re: searching better alternative for LM386
- From: Tim Shoppa
- searching better alternative for LM386
- Prev by Date: Simple problem: 0.20 V drop
- Next by Date: Re: The Psychology Behind the Worst Possible President
- Previous by thread: Re: searching better alternative for LM386
- Next by thread: Re: searching better alternative for LM386
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|