Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Thu, 18 Jan 2007 06:15:44 -0800
On 18 Jan 2007 00:07:50 -0800, miso@xxxxxxxxx wrote:
D from BC wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:45:29 GMT, PeteS <peter.smith8380@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Wed, 17 Jan 2007 21:02:09 GMT, D from BC <myrealaddress@xxxxxxxxx>But you must admit, John, it gives us some good (high profit) product
wrote:
It's just hilarious at the amount of audiophile bashing going on here.
Audiophiles shouldn't post to sed. I don't recall one ever asking an
intelligent question. They have their own groups where they can argue
over their various superstitions.
John
ideas ;)
Cheers
PeteS
The Low Oxygen Monster Cable guy is probably in the sun right now
sipping on sambuca and getting a back massage from some DD bikini
babe.. :)
D from BC
Low oxygen copper is supposed to be extremely flexible. That's about
it. Better sound? Hardly.
All electrical-grade copper is low-oxygen copper. And it all comes
from the same mills. 12/2 Romex is every bit as good as the most
expensive Monster speaker cable.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- References:
- audiophile capacitor replacement
- From: Eric
- Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- From: miso
- Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- From: Terry Given
- Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- From: D from BC
- Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- From: John Larkin
- Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- From: PeteS
- Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- From: D from BC
- Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- From: miso
- audiophile capacitor replacement
- Prev by Date: Re: Windows Vista - worst OS yet?
- Next by Date: Re: The Psychology Behind the Worst Possible President
- Previous by thread: Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- Next by thread: Re: audiophile capacitor replacement
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|