Re: Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- From: John Popelish <jpopelish@xxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 22 Jan 2007 21:52:06 -0500
D from BC wrote:
On Mon, 22 Jan 2007 11:57:17 -0500, John Popelish <jpopelish@xxxxxxxx>
wrote:
D from BC wrote:
I picked CMOS 555..just because it had that cool parallel processingWhat advantage (apart from including a few resistors) do you get by using the C555s, instead of a dual comparator?
look to it.
Also.... it's one of the most ancient IC's and a text book item. Using
it in the cct. has an artistic quality. :)
I had to pick one of the following methods:
* Schmitt inverter or schmitt gates
* Comparator with hysteresis control pin
* Positive feedback or feedback to a switch
* 2 comparators and a discrete SR latch * CMOS 555
I had to pick something... I've never used the 555 this way before and
I liked the newness factor.
Besides..prop delay, I draw, Vs specs fit the app ok.
I posted about hysteresis methods some time ago. IIRC somebody bashed
the positive feedback method in favor of the SR method.
I haven't done a study to compare the methods for an
economic/performance fitting in my app.
It was one of those "works....good enough...move on...." decisions.
Also..it's hobby electronics...I can do artsy stuff like that :)
To really answer your question...
I dunno...
Fair enough. Shouldn't you add a third C555 to control output voltage? Add a pulsed switch that adds enough load to take the current above and below the current limit on a regular basis, to see how well both voltage and current regulation work.
BTW, you don't need the resistors on the 555 outputs.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- From: D from BC
- Re: Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- References:
- Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- From: D from BC
- Re: Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- From: miso
- Re: Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- From: D from BC
- Re: Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- From: Terry Given
- Re: Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- From: D from BC
- Re: Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- From: John Popelish
- Re: Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- From: D from BC
- Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- Prev by Date: To Vista, or not to Vista
- Next by Date: Re: To Vista, or not to Vista
- Previous by thread: Re: Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- Next by thread: Re: Review this Goofy 555 Based SMPS Design
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|