Re: More on Windows Vista - worst OS yet?

On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 08:49:16 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Gave us:

On Sun, 04 Feb 2007 00:29:51 +1000, The Real Andy
<therealandy@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On 3 Feb 2007 01:35:03 -0800, "Didi" <dp@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hyperthreaded. Works fine with Vista, and is faster then XP.

Fast, faster - did those words lose their meaning? Obviously
inapplicable to whatever windows version.

Less painfully slow, hmm, that might apply.

I have always wondered how people find the patience to do
design and programming work under windows. Two seconds
wait now, oops I should not have made this right click, another
5 or 10 seconds, this a few hundred times a day - and what time
is left for anything else except waiting for windows to wrestle
with itself...
When I design and/or program I am used to tools which are
faster (usually much faster) than I am.

I look at your website and I think you are an amateur. You may have
some great product, but your website is crap. I look at the main
picture on your website and it looks as if your software was written
by a uni grad.

Sorry, but it is crap. It looks like ***, and that type of interface
typically reflects the code behind the application.


Dimiter


Please spend some dollars with an expert who can actually make you
website look professional. IT might help your business.



%<

I assume there is zero, or slightly negative, correlation between
ability to design good nuclear instruments and ability to program web
sites. Would you prefer a Flash presentation with zooming things and
music?

In my experience, verified by members of this group, the more
"designed" a web site is, the less actual customers like it.


"You're just spittin' out words to see where they splatter."
-John Wayne

That was the first thing I thought of. Then...

You know, of course, that you are wrong on this assertion...
.

Quantcast