Re: fluorescent lamp

On Tue, 6 Feb 2007 13:41:35 +0100, "Frithiof Andreas Jensen"
<frithiof.jensen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:


"Andrew Edge" <a_n_d_y_e_d_g_e@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:bh79s29apl0o7asl64b69t8d4jfkkr6321@xxxxxxxxxx
On Sat, 03 Feb 2007 02:59:47 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

The code would require an IP65 covering for outdoor use.

So, that is what shall be used! Not your problem, is it?

Which means
you could turn a high pressure water hose on the thing from all
directions and it wouldn't even flicker and is practically dust proof.
Of course I'm trying to simplify these people's lives and save them
money at my own risk obviously looking for a relatively riskfree
option if one does exist.

Why on gods green earth would you want to complicate *your* life *and* save
*other peoples* money!!?? Might as well bend over right there: You can be *sure*
that those rat-spirited, tight, b*stards will come a-whining with all manners of
scummy abulance chasing lawyers about 200 msec after somone chips a nail on the
"installation you approved".

Good point. Don't want my God given green earth to become a dark
colored prison cell because of my goodness.


Andy
.