Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: "Homer J Simpson" <nobody@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 12 Feb 2007 06:15:07 GMT
"Terry Given" <my_name@xxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1171259200.745300@xxxxxxxxxx
No nuke plants - OK, the economics are dubious, and the messes are
astonishingly hard to dispose of.
I can't believe it is impossible to manage this. I do believe that too many
have tried and failed for various reasons. Trying to hide nuclear waste in
holes in the ground seems to be one of the truly stupid ideas of all time.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: Terry Given
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- References:
- OT: Gravity explained
- From: default
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: Rich the Philosophizer
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: YD
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: Terry Given
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: Terry Given
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: Terry Given
- OT: Gravity explained
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Gravity explained
- Next by Date: Re: History of bulk electronic components suppliers
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Gravity explained
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Gravity explained
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|