Re: OT: Gravity explained

Late at night, by candle light, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> penned this immortal
opus:

On 13 Feb 2007 03:21:54 -0800, "Richard Henry" <pomerado@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Feb 12, 2:31 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 11 Feb 2007 09:12:08 -0800, "Richard Henry" <pomer...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:





On Feb 11, 8:55 am, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On 10 Feb 2007 23:32:07 -0800, "Richard Henry" <pomer...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:

On Feb 10, 5:47 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 21:55:53 GMT, Rich the Philosophizer

<r...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 09 Feb 2007 16:23:47 -0500, default wrote:

"Things fall not because they are acted upon by some gravitational
force, but because a higher intelligence, 'God' if you will, is pushing
them down," said Gabriel Burdett, who holds degrees in education,
applied Scripture, and physics from Oral Roberts University.

Gravity is Love.

Cheers!
Rich

This seems to be the original version:

http://www.theonion.com/content/node/39512

The Christian haters are happy to pick up a parody like that and
widely repeat as serious Belief, so they can then mock it.

Like the bumper sticker says, mean people suck.

Actually, I think it is a mockery of Intelligent Design, even when you
know that it is a joke.

Is ID a serious Christian belief?

It's a serious theory among some people who aren't Christians.

I'm not sure what you mean. That's not really an answer, more of an
aside.

If you're serious, please name three non-Christian advocates of the
current Intelligent Design paradigm.

Your qualification "current Intelligent Design paradigm" makes this a
trick question. But you could start here...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Panspermia


Still no answer.

Of course there's no answer to the origin of life on Earth. That was
my point. In any situation where there is no answer, you get
permission to think, if you are so inclined.

John



This justifies legislating mandatory teaching of ID to the exclusion
of other hypothesis?

- YD.

--
Remove HAT if replying by mail.
.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Gravity explained
    ... Late at night, by candle light, John Larkin ... force, but because a higher intelligence, 'God' if you will, is pushing ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Gravity explained
    ... On Feb 12, 2:31 pm, John Larkin ... force, but because a higher intelligence, 'God' if you will, is pushing ... Your qualification "current Intelligent Design paradigm" makes this a ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Gravity explained
    ... Your qualification "current Intelligent Design paradigm" makes this a ... Of course there's no answer to the origin of life on Earth. ... science education establishment to admit that they don't know ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Gravity explained
    ... force, but because a higher intelligence, 'God' if you will, is pushing ... them down," said Gabriel Burdett, who holds degrees in education, ... Your qualification "current Intelligent Design paradigm" makes this a ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Gravity explained
    ... force, but because a higher intelligence, 'God' if you will, is pushing ... them down," said Gabriel Burdett, who holds degrees in education, ... Your qualification "current Intelligent Design paradigm" makes this a ...
    (sci.electronics.design)