Re: OT: Gravity explained


"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:5is8t2tqotjuifcq89gdo5g1nkf4foropb@xxxxxxxxxx

Has that been tried lately? Seems to me that the trend is to teach
orthodox (random mutation/selection) evolution only, and not even
mention, however briefly, alternate concepts. The origin of life is a
mystery, so should be taught as such. I guess it's tough for the
science education establishment to admit that they don't know
everything.

Science is repeatable.

Religion is not.



.

Relevant Pages

  • Re: OT: Gravity explained
    ... science education establishment to admit that they don't know ... theories of the origin of life, and pointing out that none are proven. ... which is what kick-started life here on earth. ... Are you aware of some school district where discussion of panspermia ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: OT: Gravity explained
    ... science education establishment to admit that they don't know ... theories of the origin of life, and pointing out that none are proven. ... which is what kick-started life here on earth. ... Are you aware of some school district where discussion of panspermia ...
    (sci.electronics.design)