Re: Am I right?



Don Lancaster wrote:
Michael wrote:
I have some 1 watt LED's that I want to flash on and off.

I have a 317 current regulator supply set at 300 ma for 3 of them in series.

Now, I know there are alot of professional designers on this group and was wondering if I couldn't get an opinion on my approach to this, as it makes sense to me.

I know many decisions are made based on parts cost but either way I do this, the cost is about the same....the cost aspect is not what I'm concerned with.....just if I'm making "the right choice".

I initially thought I'd use a 555 timer to have a constant flash rate on an optoisoltor LED and control on/off with the LED ground.....then use the opto output and a sink transistor to control the DC path.

Cons: what if anything were to change with the transistor and present a change in the DC series circuit?....could I get an "on resistance" that would be low enough and STAY in a specific window? With 300 ma flowing through, some "potential" for disaster would be there.

So....

Why not this....which makes more sense to me....

Control the AC to the transformer with the same setup....flash a triac driver opto LED with a 555, control on/off with the opto LED ground, use a triac to switch on and off the transformer primary?

That's what I have breadboarded now...works fine.

Don't you think it would be the proper way to go as far as a design decision?......it lets the cc power supply be stable and avoids risk?

The only risk on doing it the AC way is an AC line surge but I'll use a 400 - 600v triac good for 1 amp or so.

Thanks.


Use a PIC.


Sarcastic f*c^er :)


--
Gibbo

This email address isn't real.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Am I right?
    ... I have a 317 current regulator supply set at 300 ma for 3 of them in series. ... I know many decisions are made based on parts cost but either way I do this, the cost is about the same....the cost aspect is not what I'm concerned with.....just if I'm making "the right choice". ... I initially thought I'd use a 555 timer to have a constant flash rate on an optoisoltor LED and control on/off with the LED ground.....then use the opto output and a sink transistor to control the DC path. ... Don't you think it would be the proper way to go as far as a design decision?......it lets the cc power supply be stable and avoids risk? ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Am I right?
    ... I have a 317 current regulator supply set at 300 ma for 3 of them in series. ... I know there are alot of professional designers on this group and was ... I know many decisions are made based on parts cost but either way I do this, ... output and a sink transistor to control the DC path. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Am I right?
    ... I have some 1 watt LED's that I want to flash on and off. ... I have a 317 current regulator supply set at 300 ma for 3 of them in series. ... I know many decisions are made based on parts cost but either way I do this, ... output and a sink transistor to control the DC path. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: What Is The Goal?
    ... Not really, Jerry. ... A single payer plan which is tax based would reduce the cost for most. ... The basic reason why government rations care, is to keep control of their cost growth. ... It does not work to control prices in the long run. ...
    (soc.retirement)
  • Re: What Is The Goal?
    ... A single payer plan which is tax based would reduce the cost for most. ... What I believe is that whenever "someone" else pays for the cost of ANYTHING that we need or want, we have taken the rationing decision out of the hands of the person who needs or wants that product or service, and gave that decision to the one paying the bill. ... The basic reason why government rations care, is to keep control of their cost growth. ... Under the current system, YOU never get to control the price, since you are paying for the profit of a non-essential middleman. ...
    (soc.retirement)

Quantcast