Re: Supercomputer OS's
- From: Iwo Mergler <Iwo.Mergler@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2007 18:16:15 +0000
joseph2k wrote:
For the entire top 500 they are running a Unix variant or a linux variant.
Linux "owns" the list with Unix claiming just 92 out of the 500 machines,
Mac OS X on three of them and not a single one running any M$ OS. This
includes Japan's earth simulator, a vector machine (now ranked 14). IBM
and HP are the top hardware vendors. Some interesting surprises for me.
http://www.top500.org/stats/28/os/
This is not as surprising as it sounds.
There are thousands of people worldwide capable of
porting Linux to a new architecture, and the source
code is readily available. For a new processor
or new computer architecture, Linux is the obvious
first choice.
You pick an already supported architecture similar
to your own and make a few modifications. It's a few
tens to a few hundred lines of code.
As we speak, Linux already supports about 50 different
processor families, with hundreds of different
implementations.
Can you imagine the amount of money required to get
MS to port one of their OS'es to a computer of which
less than 10 will be sold?
Regards,
Iwo
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Supercomputer OS's
- From: joseph2k
- Re: Supercomputer OS's
- From: Frithiof Andreas Jensen
- Re: Supercomputer OS's
- Prev by Date: Low-Power Design Requires an Open, Comprehensive Standard: The Unified Power Format
- Next by Date: Re: add video to dc power and then later recover video
- Previous by thread: Re: Supercomputer OS's
- Next by thread: Re: Supercomputer OS's
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|