Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: Rich Grise <rich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 18 Feb 2007 01:38:17 GMT
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 21:44:54 +0000, Michael A. Terrell wrote:
John Larkin wrote:
On Sat, 17 Feb 2007 18:11:14 GMT, "Homer J Simpson"
"John Larkin" <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
It's not about reasoning, it's about truth. It's not legit to accept
random assembly of DNA just because you find that easier to think
about.
What is the minimum strand of DNA/RNA/XNA that can replicate itself? Such
replication need not be single step.
For Pete's sake, this is a *design* newsgroup, and 99% of the people
here are hostile to ideas. No wonder I make so much money.
Not ideas. Stupid ideas.
How many million dollars worth of your ideas did you sell last year?
Don't you mean "Millionths of a dollar."?
I've made actual money by having better ideas than the other guy - I
just haven't reached the million-dollar mark yet. :-)
Cheers!
Rich
.
- References:
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: Rich the Philosophizer
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: John Devereux
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: Homer J Simpson
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: YD
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: YD
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: Homer J Simpson
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: OT: Gravity explained
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Gravity explained
- Next by Date: Re: Reference Voltage Schematic
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Gravity explained
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Gravity explained
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|