Re: Editorial Cartoon
- From: "nunya@xxxxxxx" <Alien8752@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 23 Feb 2007 17:03:49 -0800
On Feb 23, 4:10 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
"n...@xxxxxxx" wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"n...@xxxxxxx" wrote:
Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
So, tell me, who are we actually fighting in Iraq ?
Who's "we", appeaser?
Your best (and probably only serious remaining) ally. Don't worry, the > Australians willprobably still die for you. Just go easy on the 'friendly fire' won't > you ?
Sigh. This my whole point; that some people want others to die when
they want them to. Once they gain that power, they tend to extend
their influence into greater detail, like say a cheery note from a
government functionary about how your wife must henceforth go shrouded
in public, there's a good boy.
I object to this kind of thing.
Do you?
The Hijab ? Yes I think it's divisive.
I am not referring specifically to that particular set of social
rules, nor the religio-political system that supports and enforces it,
but the general pattern that it's an example of.
However, to your case in point; do you see it as "divisive" enough
to resist? If so, to what, if any, limits?
Mark L. Fergerson
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Editorial Cartoon
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Editorial Cartoon
- References:
- Re: Editorial Cartoon
- From: nunya@xxxxxxx
- Re: Editorial Cartoon
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Editorial Cartoon
- From: nunya@xxxxxxx
- Re: Editorial Cartoon
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Editorial Cartoon
- From: nunya@xxxxxxx
- Re: Editorial Cartoon
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Editorial Cartoon
- Prev by Date: Re: Effects of gaps in inductors and transformers
- Next by Date: Re: How to detonate a pipe bomb with a cell phone?
- Previous by thread: Re: Editorial Cartoon
- Next by thread: Re: Editorial Cartoon
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|