Re: TDS-1002b Any good? Comments?
- From: Jim Yanik <jyanik@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 28 Feb 2007 01:13:36 GMT
Joerg <notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in
news:X_3Fh.2396$BE2.899@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:
Anthony Fremont wrote:
Joerg wrote:
I currently have the "pleasure" to work with similar (but older)
scopes at a client. TDS220, one of the big TDSes, etc. Long story
short I am not too enthused. The 220 even spits out noise that
bothers us so has to be turned off at times. The bandwidth gets
Do you mean like down the probe cable, out the probe tip and into your
circuit, or do you mean accoustical noise?
Nope, it look like EMI from a switcher or something like that in there.
Yes,that scope has a purchased switcher PS.
It was pretty loud and messing up some analog circuitry on a breadboard.
The good old Tektronix 2465 did not do that at all.
"loud" infers an audible noise,"strong" noise would not infer audio.
--
Jim Yanik
jyanik
at
kua.net
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: TDS-1002b Any good? Comments?
- From: Joerg
- Re: TDS-1002b Any good? Comments?
- Prev by Date: Re: Effects of gaps in inductors and transformers
- Next by Date: Re: High Voltage Destruction
- Previous by thread: Re: TDS-1002b Any good? Comments?
- Next by thread: Re: TDS-1002b Any good? Comments?
- Index(es):