Re: Calibration Of Electronic Equipment In The Home Workshop

Chris Jones wrote:
Anthony Fremont wrote:

If someone doesn't need traceable calibration, then why should they
pay for
it? Especially if they have the resources to do it themselves. I'm
thinking of buying a cheap used Rb time base from e-bay so I can cal
my old Protek freq counter and adjust the timebase on my Hitachi
scope, it's certainly cheaper than having it done. Using a PIC
driven by an ordinary can xtal, and a quartz wristwatch of known
accuracy, I was able to tweak the
xtal to within about 1-2ppm over the course of a week or two. Of
course you know that's impossible, don't you?

I don't think the oscillator on a PIC would be good to 2ppm absolute
accuracy even with a very good xtal, unless you FIRST calibrate it
against something that has already been calibrated, therefore it

Like my analog/quartz watch that has a predictable error. I used the CCP
module to time the impulses to the watches stepper motor to the uS. I
already knew the error rate of my watch, so I just played with the loading
caps until I knew that I was sucessfully measuring the error of my watch
over hours of time. Since my house stayed at a fairly consistent
temperature, I think it's safe to say that it was within 2ppm, but I guess I
could be wrong.

doesn't get you far. It will however be good enough to calibrate
your scope since that would only need 1% or so, and any old crystal
should achieve that, even with a fairly primitive oscillator. For
frequency calibration, your best bet is to receive an off-air
standard, for example GPS or in many countries there are low
frequency standard transmissions (50kHz, 60kHz, 77.5kHz or others,
look up which ones are available in your country). It is quite
feasible to build your own receiver for these. These transmitters
are maintained to a higher accuracy than any piece of hardware that a
hobbyist could afford (e.g. 2 parts in 10^12).
http://www.npl.co.uk/time/msf/ctm001v05.pdf

Chris


.

Loading