Re: About leakage inductance in transformers
- From: MassiveProng <MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 03 Mar 2007 19:19:19 -0800
On Sun, 04 Mar 2007 15:18:47 +1300, Terry Given <my_name@xxxxxxxx>
Gave us:
MassiveProng wrote:
On 3 Mar 2007 10:03:02 GMT, Robert Latest <boblatest@xxxxxxxxx> Gave
us:
John Larkin wrote:
With the secondary shorted, the core has essentially no effect,
I think the leakage inductance still depends on permeability.
It probably will, but not much, since the shorted secondary is doing its
damnedest to keep flux out of the core.
In order for ANY energy to pass from the primary to the secondary,
it MUST pass through the core. Perhaps you were making some vague
reference to stored energy?
nope. If they are wound concentric (and possibly interleaved) then there
is still plenty of coupling, sans core.
That depends on the frequency. The lower it gets, the less coupling
will occur without a core.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: About leakage inductance in transformers
- From: Terry Given
- Re: About leakage inductance in transformers
- References:
- About leakage inductance in transformers
- From: The Phantom
- Re: About leakage inductance in transformers
- From: Robert Latest
- Re: About leakage inductance in transformers
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: About leakage inductance in transformers
- From: Terry Given
- About leakage inductance in transformers
- Prev by Date: Re: External clock for Analog to Digital Converter
- Next by Date: Re: Effects of gaps in inductors and transformers
- Previous by thread: Re: About leakage inductance in transformers
- Next by thread: Re: About leakage inductance in transformers
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
Loading