Re: About leakage inductance in transformers

MassiveProng wrote:
On Mon, 05 Mar 2007 03:44:05 GMT, "Harry Dellamano"
<harryd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Gave us:


"John Perry" <jp@xxxxxxx> wrote in message news:OtLGh.54$zI1.4@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Harry Dellamano wrote:

...

Terry, responding to MassiveWrong is like trying to piss into the wind, it
all comes back in your face.

...but as long as you can put up with it, I'm enjoying learning more
about magnetics than I thought I ever could.

I am, of course, editing out the MP crap from the good stuff you guys
are feeding me.

Thanks,

John Perry

I agree totally John. Every system has noise and a little noise can sometimes improve performance but too much is just disruptive. MW has no respect for others so how can we have any respect for him. Sounds like a smart tech that never became an engineer.
Cheers,
Harry


My original statement about transformers and gaps is true, and they
got *** slung back in their faces AFTER they attacked my remarks, AND
they don't even have a clue about gapped transformers.

wrong thread. This entire branch (which contains essentially all of your posts in this thread) stems from your erroneous claim (4/03/2007) that:

"In order for ANY energy to pass from the primary to the secondary,
it MUST pass through the core"


So fuck you too if you want to be on their fucktard bandwagon.

So:

MassivelyWrong has a dearth of magnetics design skills

MassivelyWrong is patently afflicted with lethologica

MassivelyWrong has dubious reading comprehension, viz. which thread he is responding to.


Cheers
Terry

.

Loading