Re: Supreme Court Ruling Today

On Mar 10, 6:49 am, Jim Yanik <jya...@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"Brian" <w3g...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote innews:1173485044.247723.268910@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx:





On Mar 9, 5:48 pm, bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
On Mar 10, 12:27 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-

Web-Site.com> wrote:
In a ruling today, with regard to gun-restrictive laws in DC, The
Court said that the 2nd Amendment guarantees the right for INDIVIDUALS
to bear arms ;-)

Read it and weep, liberal ***.

As if your Supreme Court hadn't been stuffed with right wing idiots by
a succession of Republican administrations, who happen to have had the
good luck to be in power when previous Supreme Court judges have died.

Dubbya wouldn't have been elected if Regan and his father hadn't done
such a partisan job.

It is something to weep about, but your spectacularly high rate of gun
murder is one of the lesser evils that this unfortunate habit has won
for you.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

How can someone like you, who is supposed to be intelligent, not
realize you are so very wrong? It has been proven time and time again
that higher crime rates exist in areas where law-abiding people are
not allowed to have guns. This CERTAINLY has proven to be true in DC,
as well as the Third World, like the EU.

Sloman is SUCH a hoot...the USSC has been divided 5-4 on most of it's
recent rulings,and they have slanted more towards the LIBERAL side than the
conservative side.They've even decided cases based on what EUROPE
does,entirely UNConstitutional.

At least he has the (lame)excuse that he's in the Netherlands.

Even the most right wing organisation will have differences of opinion
- pointing out that some of the neocons involved are more rabid than
the others doesn't make the institution itself look any less extremist
to the rest of the world.

--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen

.

Quantcast