Re: That global warming thingy

In article <45F4460E.B0B7C198@xxxxxxxxxxx>, Eeyore wrote:

MassiveProng wrote:

default <default@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Gave us:

Ignoring the situation may make you feel better - but when you
consider what is at stake wouldn't it make more sense to err on the
side of caution?

Tell that to impoverished South Africans that have no electricity
because of retarded twits like you.

You're thinking of that doctor who was grumbling about the uselessness of solar
PV panels ?


Should we industrialized nations be the only ones with electrical
power?

He made a very good point I thought that 'the West' wants to make it expensive
for them.


Why aren't you getting by without using it? Hmmmm?

You're a Hypocrite!

Lemmie guess... you don't think the oceans produce CO2?

Watch the flic, dip***.

It seems to make far more sense to me that CO2 levels should trail warming.
After all there's so much CO2 trapped in solution in the oceans.

In the past few hundred thousand years, CO2 rise during a warming period
has resulted from warming, and has been a positive feedback mechanism,
causing more warming. Similarly, temperature drops run into positive
feedback from a cooler world removing CO2 from the atmosphere.

In recent decades, things have been different. CO2 content in the
atmosphere has increased by an amount less than humans dumped into it, so
some of the CO2 from human activity has gone into the oceans and increased
their CO2 content.

- Don Klipstein (don@xxxxxxxxx)
.

Loading