Re: Quotation of the day



On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 16:14:33 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 17:18:25 -0500, John Fields
<jfields@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 12:31:42 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Sun, 11 Mar 2007 18:28:04 +0000, Eeyore
<rabbitsfriendsandrelations@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:



John Larkin wrote:

The big picture is that you can't distribute more than there is.

---
Sure you can. Ever since we stopped backing up our paper money with
gold and silver, all those notes say is: "Trust me, I'm good for
it."
---


Conservation of mass. Money is just used to control distribution and
to trade off consumption versus investment. Money doesn't create
wealth, it just measures it.

---
Really?

How do you think banks get wealthy? By selling popcorn?
No, they get wealthy by charging me money to borrow your money.

Sure, they take wealth from you, and give it to their employees and
shareholders, but that's just redistribution. Banks don't *create*
wealth, unless the loan facilitates something truly efficient and
productive.

---
Nonsense. They create wealth by charging interest. Whether wealth
is created by the borrower or not is immaterial; their interest is
in the interest.
---

I never borrow money, except for mortgages, where the asset
appreciates faster than the interest.

---
That's conjecture, and a guess on your part as to what the asset
will be worth in the future. If real estate values fall and you
want to sell, you could be in for a come-uppance.
---

The bitch with borrowing is that you have to pay it back.

---
I don't mind paying it back, since it wasn't mine to begin with.
What I mind is legally sanctioned usury.
---

If the Governmant gives you a million
dollars, you would seem to be better off.

---
No, I _would_ be better off.

Maybe. But a lot of lottery winners wind up very unhappy as a result.

---
Oh, well...


--
JF
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: Atheists: Americas most distrusted minority
    ... I still don't see whats wrong with leaving one's kids wealth. ... telling someone they've worked their life for the govt, ... I think there is a fundemental difference of thought in what money is. ...
    (rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated)
  • Re: Business as usual
    ... Unearned money that comes from some faceless entity ... Both amount to a redistribution of wealth that, ... Taxation was in the millions--so the business had to be sold. ... the economics aren't working in the favor of recycling in your ...
    (rec.crafts.metalworking)
  • Re: The Electric Car
    ... That's not making money that stealing money. ... Each has 3 balls 3 bats and 3 gloves. ... Merrill Lynch Capgemini 2007 World Wealth Report has determined ... Just rich ones? ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Not to be smug or anything, but...
    ... minorities whose share of the nation's wealth is less than average. ... Democrats gather the votes of the poor and ignorant, ... truly rich folk know how to protect their money. ... Hence my use pf the phrase "all taxation". ...
    (alt.smokers.cigars)
  • Re: Whats Wrong With Billionaires?
    ... For instance Rockefeller made a whole lot of money, but as a result, there are organizations which are using that money, like the Rockefeller Foundation, who has done a great deal to make the world a better place to live in....probably a lot more good, then whatever evil we attach to the name. ... Howard Hughes was a wealthy man, yet the medical foundation he founded, is using that wealth to solve many of the worlds medical problems. ... And of course we have those Hollywood types, who may not be billionaires, who don't seem to match their concern for the common man, by spending some of their accumulated wealth to help the common man that they seem so concerned about. ... Happiness and perceived success are intimately linked: ...
    (soc.retirement)