Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts

---

• From: MassiveProng <MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 01:35:29 -0700

---

On Sun, 18 Mar 2007 18:12:34 GMT, "Jeff L" <levy_jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Gave us:

The process is proven.

The process of establishing your stupidity.
.

---

• References:
  • Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
    • From: Joerg
  • Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
    • From: John Larkin
  • Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
    • From: Frank Raffaeli
  • Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
    • From: Joerg
  • Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
    • From: MassiveProng
  • Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
    • From: Jeff L
  • Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
    • From: MassiveProng
  • Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
    • From: Jeff L
  • Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
    • From: MassiveProng
  • Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
    • From: Jeff L

• Prev by Date: Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
• Next by Date: 320pin BGA Pin Layout suggestions
• Previous by thread: Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
• Next by thread: Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread

• Windows
• Science
• Usenet

• Archive
• About
• Privacy
• Search
• Imprint

sci.tech-archive.net  > Archive  > sci.electronics.design  > 2007-03