Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: MassiveProng <MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:06:05 -0700
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:39:08 GMT, "Jeff L" <levy_jeff@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Gave us:
Your in California
That would be "You're", you retarded, gang educated dip***.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- References:
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: Frank Raffaeli
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: Joerg
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: Jeff L
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: Jeff L
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: Jeff L
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: Jeff L
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- Prev by Date: Re: Divide by 200 single IC
- Next by Date: Re: 320pin BGA Pin Layout suggestions
- Previous by thread: Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- Next by thread: Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- Index(es):
