Re: OT: Guns in Space
- From: MassiveProng <MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 19 Mar 2007 17:27:38 -0700
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 07:12:05 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Gave us:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 03:47:45 -0700, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 15:37:53 +1100, "Phil Allison"
<philallison@xxxxxxxxxx> Gave us:
It's an ellipse because, except for the minor detail of crashing into
the earth,
** Crash is what just it does - every time.
You mean the LarkinTard thinks it is an ellipse as well?!!!
NO!
I explained why it can't be a parabola, namely because the gravity
vector changes direction as the shell moves horizontally. Of course
you don't understand that, and your record of being wrong grows,
undiminished.
Just think of all those sciemce and physics teachers who lied to us.
Just take a look at any one of hundreds of artillery links, some of
which were provided, jackass.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Guns in Space
- From: Don Klipstein
- Re: OT: Guns in Space
- References:
- OT: Guns in Space
- From: D from BC
- Re: OT: Guns in Space
- From: Jonathan Kirwan
- Re: OT: Guns in Space
- From: krw
- Re: OT: Guns in Space
- From: Don Klipstein
- Re: OT: Guns in Space
- From: Phil Allison
- Re: OT: Guns in Space
- From: John Larkin
- Re: OT: Guns in Space
- From: Phil Allison
- Re: OT: Guns in Space
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: OT: Guns in Space
- From: John Larkin
- OT: Guns in Space
- Prev by Date: Re: Divide by 200 single IC
- Next by Date: Re: Tracking of Killer Asteroids Runs Low on Money and Short on Time
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Guns in Space
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Guns in Space
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|