Re: Micpre of Graham
- From: Hawker <Hawker{removethispart}@ashevillecommunity.org>
- Date: Tue, 20 Mar 2007 14:01:09 -0500
On 3/20/2007 11:32 AM, The digits of Ban's hands composed the following:
I think it is from Rane. Look at the offset adjust pins used for frequency compensation. The 5534A is IMHO better than the decompensated version(5532), less noise, higher slew rate and GBW, for gains above 3.
I think I was getting confused, you are correct, sorry.
I was thinking the 5534 was the quad, not single part. I remember the compensation is in the single part if I remember correctly.
I'm not doing much analog these days. Mostly doing digital design. My part number memory is getting bad.
-H
.
- References:
- Micpre of Graham
- From: Ban
- Re: Micpre of Graham
- From: Hawker
- Re: Micpre of Graham
- From: Ban
- Micpre of Graham
- Prev by Date: Re: OT: Guns in Space
- Next by Date: Re: Tracking of Killer Asteroids Runs Low on Money and Short on Time
- Previous by thread: Re: Micpre of Graham
- Next by thread: Re: Micpre of Graham
- Index(es):