Re: Tracking of Killer Asteroids Runs Low on Money and Short on Time

In article <7bc003937cmou0fbvqdndpmo721hc6l3m7@xxxxxxx>,
jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:44:20 -0400, krw <krw@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

In article <lbfuv2lda2m6gdh514hpovugvr5cm1uv3e@xxxxxxx>,
jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
On Tue, 20 Mar 2007 00:29:31 +0000 (UTC), don@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx (Don
Klipstein) wrote:

In art. <ff1uv2l4cv2vdihre3v7ul4onsmj9m9pbe@xxxxxxx>, Jim Thompson wrote:
On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 13:10:42 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Mon, 19 Mar 2007 12:21:53 -0700, Jim Thompson wrote:

Anyone besides me notice the language similarities between Robert
Paterno, MinimumDong and Fred Bloggs?

Particularly since "Fred" posted some Richmond stuff recently.

Multi-personality disorder ?:-)

Fred can do math and understands electronics, so he can't possibly be
MicroProng.

Who is RP?

Robert, the notorious, from years past.

My suspicions are that MP was JoeBloe, Roy L. Fuchs and DarkMatter.


No doubt. Calling everybody in the group a "fucktard" is sort of the
giveaway. And getting *everything* wrong.

How does get *everything* wrong? Wouldn't it be hard to do even on
purpose?


That seems like a paradox, until you consider that, for any given
issue, there is only one "right" but an infinitude of "wrongs".

Since he's angry at everyone else and thinks we're all retards, and
since most people who post here are generally knowledgable, he
preferentially picks the wrong answers. So, without knowing much about
the science itself, he is effectively able to be wrong on purpose.

Nice theory, but he offers left-field theories right out of the
blocks. He brought up "guns in space" and "torque arms" all by
himself.

Plus, he craves public humiliation.

Must.

--
Keith
.