Re: Tracking of Killer Asteroids Runs Low on Money and Short on Time

On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 17:20:27 -0700, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 21 Mar 2007 07:11:04 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Gave us:


I've said, many times, that I assume the bullet embedds itself in the
ball and is not deflected.


I don't care what you ASSume, fucktard. You didn't start THAT baby
bull*** until you were cornered.

I'm not cornered, never was. So far, everybody agrees with me and
nobody agrees with you.

My first calculation with the .22 and the bowling ball - which I asked
you to compute, which you refused to compute - assumed the bullet hit
dead center and embedded itself in the ball.

"Assume" doesn't mean guess or bluster or argue in this context. It
means a clear statement of the problem, to remove any ambiguity, so
one can go ahead and crunch the numbers. I could assume the bullet is
rubber, hits dead center, and bounces straight back; that would lead
to a different velocity and a different energy imparted to the ball.
Try it.


John


.

Loading