Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 23 Mar 2007 22:05:41 -0800
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:55:01 -0700, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:42:00 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Gave us:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 21:05:37 -0700, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Fri, 23 Mar 2007 08:30:55 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Gave us:
Everyone calls this machine a vapor degreaser, including the people
who make it.
No ***. The key is that you are supposed to clean your part IN THE
VAPOR, not in the boiling bath.
I make my own rules.
Dude, you are fucking THICK!
How much worth of electronics did you sell last year?
Not in the least bit relevant, sidestep boy!
It is relevant. If I followed your rules, I probably wouldn't have
sold anything.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- References:
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: Glen Walpert
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: Jeff L
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- Prev by Date: Re: Hysterical Laugh of the Day
- Next by Date: Re: Evil Designers Guide to Copying Patents
- Previous by thread: Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- Next by thread: Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- Index(es):