Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 25 Mar 2007 13:15:05 -0800
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 11:55:36 -0700, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Sun, 25 Mar 2007 10:23:41 -0800, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Gave us:
I'm growing positively fond of BGAs.
But don't know the first thing about cleaning the assemblies
correctly, or economically!
You are one of those idiots that glosses over all the tasks you
consider menial.
I already said our production manager is a genius for processes. I
have enormous respect for all our production and process people, who
*are* better than me at this sort of stuff. I like them, too.
Do you like anybody? Doesn't look like it from here.
IT IS BROKE, YOU SHOULD FIX IT.
Both your process and your fucktard mentality!
What's wrong with 100% yield? Can you do better?
We build and ship stuff. We send invoices. People send us checks, and
occasionally plaques and letters of appreciation [1]. The system
works. It's the end of the fiscal year, bonus time! I share the
profits with the people who "broke" our processes.
John
[1] and some really cool Dragon Lady posters and patches from the
Skunk Works.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: Frank Raffaeli
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- References:
- Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: Joerg
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: vasile
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: Joerg
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- From: MassiveProng
- Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- Prev by Date: Re: AC/DC problem
- Next by Date: Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- Previous by thread: Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- Next by thread: Re: Future: 0603 versus 0402 parts
- Index(es):