Re: HPM weapons
- From: John Larkin <jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 03 Apr 2007 12:47:35 -0700
On Tue, 03 Apr 2007 19:20:51 GMT, Rich Grise <rich@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Mon, 02 Apr 2007 22:58:15 +0000, Mike Monett wrote:
"Tim Williams" <tmoranwms@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
There's no reason, then, that microwaves at perhaps 10GHz can't be
focused into a beam (or at least a spot) of perhaps 300mm, which
easily covers the surface of any general aviation or fighter or bomber
aircraft several times.
Antennas are reciprocal. So why don't we have radio astronomy antennas that
can give as good resolution as the Hubble telescope?
They do, and maybe even better, given the wavelength of the incident
radiation. :-)
BTW, this is another reason to put bases on the moon and stations at
LL4 and/or LL5 - Very Long-Base Interferometry. :-)
And imagine the accuracy we could get with a Mars parsec! ;-)
Cheers!
Rich
If we got rid of the idiotic space station, and dumped the Shuttle
program and its replacement, we could afford to do a lot of serious
science.
John
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: HPM weapons
- From: Rich the Philosophizer
- Re: HPM weapons
- From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
- Re: HPM weapons
- References:
- HPM weapons
- From: John Larkin
- Re: HPM weapons
- From: Jamie
- Re: HPM weapons
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: HPM weapons
- From: Jamie
- Re: HPM weapons
- From: Jim Yanik
- Re: HPM weapons
- From: Tim Williams
- Re: HPM weapons
- From: Mike Monett
- Re: HPM weapons
- From: Rich Grise
- HPM weapons
- Prev by Date: Re: Termination Resistor - RS-485 line.
- Next by Date: Re: one channel radio frequency help
- Previous by thread: Re: HPM weapons
- Next by thread: Re: HPM weapons
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|
