Re: Q about noise in time interval measurement averging
- From: bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 9 Apr 2007 15:59:05 -0700
On Apr 9, 7:06 pm, "colin" <colin.ro...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
"John Larkin" <jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:g0pk13d9irs7sj10t7kaj5bq44bkkclavk@xxxxxxxxxx
On 9 Apr 2007 08:44:27 -0700, bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
It would help to know what the op is actually trying to
do.
Im not so sure, it would just add to the confusion,
you'd probably have lots more questions ...
It is rare for a newby to tell us all we need to know to let us
produce good answers to their question on the first or second go
round, but their answers do tend to dimish the confusion, rather than
adding to it.
Many of the gurus on this user-group have had a lot of practice at
going from what the customers think they want to what the customers
really needs. Some of us have gotten pretty good at it.
basically the signal is cyclic over a few seconds so any long term change is
ignored, the phase varies cyclicly over a much longer period which is the measurement
of interest.
The phase of what relative to what?
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Q about noise in time interval measurement averging
- From: colin
- Re: Q about noise in time interval measurement averging
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Q about noise in time interval measurement averging
- From: colin
- Re: Q about noise in time interval measurement averging
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: Q about noise in time interval measurement averging
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Q about noise in time interval measurement averging
- From: colin
- Q about noise in time interval measurement averging
- Prev by Date: Re: Got an invention? - Let everyone know
- Next by Date: Re: ATTENTION: sci.electronics.design
- Previous by thread: Re: Q about noise in time interval measurement averging
- Next by thread: Re: Q about noise in time interval measurement averging
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|