Re: Why are WebCams so poor?
- From: Rich Grise <rich@xxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 10 Apr 2007 17:55:04 GMT
On Mon, 09 Apr 2007 22:25:41 -0500, James Waldby wrote:
Rich Grise wrote:
...
One last try next, splitting it into 250KB chunks.
I've observed that problem - what newsclient do you use to post
broken-up stuff?
pan works ok on such files - puts them together fairly transparently
Oh, yeah - I can read them just fine.
But what do I do if I have a 4MB mpg that I want to post, and neither
of my newsclients will do it because the file's too big?
IOW, I already know how to reconstitute what someone else has posted,
but how do I _MAKE_ a multipart post?
Heck, pan doesn't even have an "attach file" button that I can find;
knode tries to upload the file, and the next morning it says, "Couldn't
upload - file is too big."
Thanks,
Rich
(I have a certain porno clip that I'd like to ask if anyone has
seen a part II of. Needless to say, it won't be in a.b.s.e . :-) )
.
- References:
- Re: Why are WebCams so poor?
- From: Michael A. Terrell
- Re: Why are WebCams so poor?
- From: Donald
- Re: Why are WebCams so poor?
- From: Tony Williams
- Re: Why are WebCams so poor?
- From: MassiveProng
- Re: Why are WebCams so poor?
- From: Tony Williams
- Re: Why are WebCams so poor?
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: Why are WebCams so poor?
- From: James Waldby
- Re: Why are WebCams so poor?
- Prev by Date: Re: What a newsgroup!!!
- Next by Date: Re: TI-Burr-Brown parts shartage?
- Previous by thread: Re: Why are WebCams so poor?
- Next by thread: Re: Why are WebCams so poor?
- Index(es):