Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx
- Date: 12 Apr 2007 20:51:38 -0700
On Apr 13, 1:05 am, Eeyore <rabbitsfriendsandrelati...@xxxxxxxxxxx>
wrote:
bill.slo...@xxxxxxxx wrote:
Eeyore wrote:
I can point you to a site (that's run by a guy who's been a reviewer for the IPCC) > where he providesevidence that the IPCC has been to say the least 'unhelpful'.
http://www.climateaudit.org/?cat=23
So he has a bee in his bonnet about small temperature changes in the
last few hundred years. The temperature changes he is excited about
are simply too noisy and too localised to be much use to anybody, but
you can't tell that to a one-issue nutter.
I can only conclude that you couldn't be bothered to read it properly.
http://www.climateaudit.org/?p=640#more-640
I don't think anybody in their right mind could be bothered to read it
properly. It isn't what anyone could call a structured document.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: joseph2k
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- References:
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: bill . sloman
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- From: Eeyore
- Re: OT: Climate Change
- Prev by Date: Re: Why blue resistors?
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Climate Change
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Climate Change
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Climate Change
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|