Re: Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- From: "john jardine" <john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 17 Apr 2007 23:28:07 +0100
<rkl@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176784674.116128.299410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[...]
[...]
Now we have to replace the SLA with Li-Poly or NiMH or other non-lead
technology, but it gets tricky.
What's the "have to" business?. Is it specific to your industry, or are we
all going to be buggered by new regulations?.
Personally I wouldn't choose to specify anything other than sealed lead
acid. It's Victorian technology but a damned sight more
reliable/predictable/cheaper than the newer fluff.
--
Posted via a free Usenet account from http://www.teranews.com
.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- Prev by Date: Re: MASSACRED ENGINEERING STUDENTS
- Next by Date: Re: Dead Compact Fluorescent Examination
- Previous by thread: Re: Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- Next by thread: Re: Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|