Re: Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- From: rkl@xxxxxxxxxx
- Date: 17 Apr 2007 19:31:12 -0700
On Apr 18, 8:28 am, "john jardine" <j...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
<r...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote in message
news:1176784674.116128.299410@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
[...]
Now we have to replace the SLA with Li-Poly or NiMH or other non-lead
technology, but it gets tricky.
[...]
What's the "have to" business?. Is it specific to your industry, or are we
all going to be buggered by new regulations?.
Personally I wouldn't choose to specify anything other than sealed lead
acid. It's Victorian technology but a damned sight more
reliable/predictable/cheaper than the newer fluff.
RoHS lead and cadmium are out. We had a good run with SLA.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- References:
- Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- From: rkl
- Re: Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- From: john jardine
- Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- Prev by Date: Re: Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- Next by Date: Re: MASSACRED ENGINEERING STUDENTS
- Previous by thread: Re: Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- Next by thread: Re: Battery and Charger Strategy - any ideas?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|