Re: How can an antenna be used for both rx and tx?

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 16:57:48 -0700, MassiveProng
<MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 18 Apr 2007 08:40:59 -0700, Don Bowey <dbowey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Gave us:

On 4/18/07 12:10 AM, in article k2hb23t1jt3a0c7lthved6qauvbmmnik12@xxxxxxx,
"MassiveProng" <MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 18:45:52 -0700, Don Bowey <dbowey@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Gave us:

On 4/17/07 4:05 PM, in article 9lka23dfvqj69brq2vs04hfil86jjn4kaf@xxxxxxx,
"MassiveProng" <MassiveProng@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Tue, 17 Apr 2007 17:43:04 -0500, "Anthony Fremont"
<spam-not@xxxxxxxxxxx> Gave us:

When it comes to antennas, you're not too far off. ;-)


But you are.

I disagree. Just where do you believe he was wrong?

In calling it black magic.

And just in the fact the he is simply off... Too far.

As usual, your reply is empty of any intelligent information. When you
don't understand a subject, why do you bother to cover it up with blatant
ignorance?


I designed and built antennas back in the 70's dip***. I also did
so a year ago in the 2.5 - 5 GHz range.

More abuse lies, and Walter Mitty fantasies.

What was that, asswipe?

You wouldn't know Yagi Uda from Yogi Bear.

X-Complaints-To: admin@xxxxxxx

.

Loading