Re: How about flooding a.u.k ?
- From: SuperM@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Date: Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:20:34 -0700
On Mon, 30 Apr 2007 01:40:10 +0100, Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
<dirk.bruere@xxxxxxxxx> Gave us:
Eeyore wrote:
We're far better at off-topic nonsense than they are.What, like the jihad needs scientists thread?
How about pissing in *their* playpen ?
Graham
Trust me, anyone that stoops to their level of retardation deserves to
be considered one of them.
It is also a TOS violation, and the DockYard is probably too dumb to
do it with the level of retarded perfection they have achieved.
It has to be one of the most stupid suggestions he has ever made.
.
- References:
- How about flooding a.u.k ?
- From: Eeyore
- Re: How about flooding a.u.k ?
- From: Dirk Bruere at NeoPax
- How about flooding a.u.k ?
- Prev by Date: Re: *** Dr G Polya BRILLIANTLY analyses the Virgina Shooting Incident ***
- Next by Date: Re: ***** Yikes what happened in SED? ******
- Previous by thread: Re: How about flooding a.u.k ?
- Next by thread: Re: How about flooding a.u.k ?
- Index(es):