Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- From: Phil Hobbs <pcdh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 04 May 2007 13:18:57 -0400
MooseFET wrote:
On May 3, 7:27 pm, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Thu, 03 May 2007 22:05:01 -0400, BFoelschHolding current constant, we can find the rate that power and the
field increases with N.
Scaling arguments--fun.
<=> is proportional to.
P = I^2 * R <=> N^2
Field <=> integral(1/N) <=> ln(N)
Therefor for a very thick coil:
Field/P <=> ln(N)/ N^2
This assumes that the core is a small perturbation on the inductance of one turn at the outer edge, which is true for open cores but not for closed ones. For closed-loop cores, the field is determined by the total current threading the loop. Position doesn't matter, at least not until order (iirc) 1/mu**2. If "solenoid" here has the physicsy meaning of "a coil wound like a Miniductor", this is true, but if it means "a push-pull magnetic actuator whose magnetic circuit is nearly closed at all times" then it isn't.
Cheers,
Phil Hobbs
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- From: MooseFET
- Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- References:
- Coil EMF volt vs current
- From: Mike Lennis
- Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- From: Mike Lennis
- Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- From: BFoelsch
- Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- From: MooseFET
- Coil EMF volt vs current
- Prev by Date: Re: IC DIP
- Next by Date: Re: low input impedance amplifier
- Previous by thread: Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- Next by thread: Re: Coil EMF volt vs current
- Index(es):