Re: Painless micro program
- From: MooseFET <kensmith@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: 19 May 2007 20:50:27 -0700
On May 19, 5:54 pm, krw <k...@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
In article <1179616199.332790.162...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,[... CDP1802 ...]
kensm...@xxxxxxxxx says...
Well, the 8051, at least in its original incantation, isn't much of a
screamer either (12 clocks per op, as well).
There's a big difference between 12 cycles of a 12MHz clock and 12
cycles of a 2 MHZ clock. Besides:
A = B + C
Compiles to something like 16 instructions if A, B and C are randomly
located in the RAM area.
[....]
Not very. Almost every computer keyboard on the planet has an
"8048" in it.
I think today it is more of a 8048 like core in a special chip. I
wouldn't be surprised to see only one package inside a keyboard. With
the kind of quantity they are made in today a special purpose IC makes
a lot of sense.
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: Painless micro program
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: Painless micro program
- From: krw
- Re: Painless micro program
- References:
- Painless micro program
- From: rnscrs
- Re: Painless micro program
- From: Donald
- Re: Painless micro program
- From: MooseFET
- Re: Painless micro program
- From: John Larkin
- Re: Painless micro program
- From: MooseFET
- Re: Painless micro program
- From: joseph2k
- Re: Painless micro program
- From: Rich Grise
- Re: Painless micro program
- From: MooseFET
- Re: Painless micro program
- From: krw
- Painless micro program
- Prev by Date: Re: (WAY OT): Volunteer Spirit of America?
- Next by Date: Re: Painless micro program
- Previous by thread: Re: Painless micro program
- Next by thread: Re: Painless micro program
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|