Re: PCB Layout Designers



On Wed, 23 May 2007 11:26:42 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlarkin@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

On Wed, 23 May 2007 09:23:55 +0800, budgie <me@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

I'm a one-man band when it comes to circuit and pcb design, and I prefer manual
layout (two layers only) over importing a schematic into the pcb software. I
find that:

. package placement is easier without the ratsnest, but with the ability to
have just a selection of interconnections showing.
. the autorouter is great at achieving 85% faster than me, but often fails to
complete and I have to undo sooo much that I haven't used autorouting in the
last five years.
. I have developed a fairly thorough and successful checking process that
hasn't let a layout/connection error through in those five years.

We recently did a board that has over 1000 parts, including a uP and
two FPGAs, 8 layers, parts on both sides. Hand checking that would
probably take two people a week or so, one calling out connections and
the other tracing them. PADS will do a full connectivity check on this
board in about 2 seconds, and a full design-rule check in under 10.

We operate in different worlds, John { ;) >

(snip)

We never autoroute

I wonder how many do autoroute at both your level and down here at the base
where I operate. The tools are there, but I don't think it is ego that stops
most layout people lwetting the autorouter have a go.

and almost always go with the pins as originally
assigned on the schematic, ie no pin or gate swapping. We also often
pass the design around from person to person. An engineer may do some
critical placement as a model, our layout guy does the real work, then
another engineer or two may have a final lick at it, checking critical
clock nets and such.

I'm surprised that you don't accommodate gate swapping. Assigning a gate from a
package at schematic time is an arbitrary thing, and can't second-guess which
gate will provide the best layout.
.



Relevant Pages

  • Re: PCB Layout / Autorouter software
    ... I'm looking for some PCB Layout / Autorouter software for PC and/or ... I use the auto router for ideas and then route it my way. ... Placement is 70% of the battle. ... I've never tried a really high-end, like $50K, autorouter. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Protel or ORcad?
    ... IMO OrCAD is a dying product. ... The Schematics and Simulation are still OK, but the layout ... Cadence is pushing new customers to buy Allegro instead of Layout. ... Both Layout and Allegro use the Specctra autorouter which can do good ...
    (sci.electronics.cad)
  • Re: peak oil revisited
    ... I agree with your "doubt of Peak Oil concept", ... enviro turds and all the little green idiots will not arrive ... oil boys too are of course in their biz for the sake of money also. ...
    (sci.physics)
  • Re: this is getting crazy
    ... Did you use an autorouter on this? ... We have found that the key to a painless layout is lots ... I try to select component packages that will provide for the best ... physical flow of signals on the board. ...
    (sci.electronics.design)
  • Re: Peak oil is an balloon, lets break it.
    ... >> I am in doubt of Peak Oil concept. ... the methane hydrates will remain off limits. ... > oil boys too are of course in their biz for the sake of money also. ...
    (sci.physics)