Re: square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- From: "Phil Allison" <philallison@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Fri, 1 Jun 2007 00:26:34 +1000
"Steve the Jerk Off"
What I am saying is that if you only look at a small piece of the wave
period, you do not get any information about what frequencies are required
to produce the parts you aren't looking at.
** Read the damn heading - Steve !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Says " time domain" !!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Got the fucking faintest what that is ??????????
Obviously NOT !!!!!!!!!!! !!
The FFT cannot analyse portions of a waveform it never saw.
** It cannot " time domain" analyse any damn thing
- you dopey fuckwit !!
Why the **HELL** are so many otherwise quite knowledgeable folk * totally*
off the PLANET on such a simple issue.
........ Phil
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- From: Steve
- Re: square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- References:
- square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- From: Thomas Magma
- Re: square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- From: John Larkin
- Re: square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- From: Thomas Magma
- Re: square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- From: Steve
- Re: square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- From: Thomas Magma
- Re: square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- From: Steve
- square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- Prev by Date: Re: square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- Next by Date: Re: OT: Yet Another Unhappy Customer for Vista
- Previous by thread: Re: square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- Next by thread: Re: square wave harmonic theory (time domain)
- Index(es):