Re: more laws
- From: bill.sloman@xxxxxxxx
- Date: Fri, 01 Jun 2007 19:53:03 -0700
On Jun 2, 2:25 am, Jim Thompson <To-Email-Use-The-Envelope-I...@My-Web-
Site.com> wrote:
On Fri, 01 Jun 2007 16:00:03 -0700, John Larkin
<jjlar...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
http://www.conformity.com/0631/
John
Well! Now we know how to beat the EU in the next war... drop magnets
;-)
Jim is reliably out of touch with reality - static magnetic fields
never did anybody any harm. Magnetic resonance scans involve much
higher magnetic fields than you can get out of a permanent magnet.
--
Bill Sloman, Nijmegen
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: more laws
- From: Barry Lennox
- Re: more laws
- From: Joerg
- Re: more laws
- References:
- more laws
- From: John Larkin
- Re: more laws
- From: Jim Thompson
- more laws
- Prev by Date: Re: Cleaning Scanner Glass (Inside) hp3970
- Next by Date: Re: Markings on Big shunt - what is R?
- Previous by thread: Re: more laws
- Next by thread: Re: more laws
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|