Re: schematics and PCB design software. what's best?
- From: Robert Baer <robertbaer@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 09 Jun 2007 03:55:21 GMT
Joerg wrote:
Robert Baer wrote:** *None* of those supposed functions worked in any shape, size or form.
Joerg wrote:
JeffM wrote:Over the years, i tried various versions of Eagle, and was never able to get any one of them to work; at best it was impossible to copy and/or place any simple part (spell resistor, please).
Fernando Peral Pérez wrote:
i'm using OrCAD[...]I'm thinking of changing.
Joerg wrote:
cadsoftusa.com
Cadsoft used to be in the CAD business.
They are now also in the DRM business.
http://www.google.com/search?q=cache:rKVDtJhW8hgJ:en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Digital_rights_management+Copyrights+Copyrights+Copyrights+restrict-the-use-*-*-*-*-*
Before re-using anyone else's library,
http://groups.google.com/group/comp.arch.embedded/browse_frm/thread/f794e82d26b59e18/d7cf4149edb93ac7?q=*-*-website+reuse+paying.*+*-I-will-switch+cracked-*+*.would.not.help.*+zzz+after-*-*-version-*+copied+*.*.unlock.*.designs+*-*-*-*-exchange-*-*-*-*-third-party+reused+qq+*-*-single-bit-*-*-*-*+useless+*-*-*-projects-could-no-longer-be-opened
find out how to un-DRM the documents that are created with it.
That's about schematics generated with a cracked copy. Not an issue for me since I never copy parts of schematics from anywhere. Copying stuff and then using it for commercial purposes is, well, not quite within my understanding of ethics and etiquette.
This has generated some noise among Cadsoft users since it does inconvenience hobby users. But ok, they've got to do something against hackers ripping them off. I doubt that their software engineers are working for free. Unlike many other CAD packages Eagle does not require those dreaded dongles. That is a serious plus in my eyes.
BTW libraries are another serious upside for Eagle. Other comnpanies want serious Dollars for a new library. Cadsoft lets you download it for free. It's give and take, with most libraries contributed by users. Which also means you must take them with a grain of salt and thoroughly check things like footprints before using a part from a foreign library. I adopted the habit of creating my own parts.
Eagle is also remarkably inexpensive compared to products such as OrCad. That was one serious motivator for me to switch. But the main motivator was the support which is absolutely stellar.
Some free quality software?
Investigate gEDA and KiCAD.
Each was created by engineers "scratching an itch".
My experience with open source software is, to put it mildly, mixed. I haven't tried these two yet but I am not going to switch again. Support is also a dicey topic when it comes to open source products.
It just takes a little practice. For example, in Eagle-speak cut means copy and so on. For me the switch from OrCad to Eagle was similar to learning to drive a car in Scotland, with right-hand steering. After a couple of days it felt comfortable.
Placing is easy. Click ADD, then pick a resistor you like from the discretes lib or from the SMT lib. If you have the German edition it would be called Widerstand. You can select EU style or US style, and all kinds of packages.
Most of the time i was lucky that the damn program installed inthe first place.
** You do not have to sell the PC; just clone the HD and remove what you do not want me to see, and send me that.
So Eagle is totally out of the picture for me *unless* someone would create from scratch, a Win2K hard drive with a completely WORKING version of Eagle, and sell that to me.
C'mon, it ain't that hard. Mine does run on the Win2K PC but I can't sell you my PC because I need it. And I am not going to retire anytime soon ;-)
I will put it in a removeable HD kit carrier so i can swap it in when i need to run Eagle.
What would be your asking price?
.
DipTrace (if i remember the name correctly) is *almost* exactly what i can use; it has some very nice features. But for small parts (SOT23-5 etc) it is not useful.
Don't know that one. Eagle can do pretty much anything, even the teeny tiny SC-75 packages. But I usually don't do layouts myself.
- Follow-Ups:
- References:
- schematics and PCB design software. what's best?
- From: Fernando Peral Pérez
- Re: schematics and PCB design software. what's best?
- From: Joerg
- Re: schematics and PCB design software. what's best?
- From: JeffM
- Re: schematics and PCB design software. what's best?
- From: Joerg
- Re: schematics and PCB design software. what's best?
- From: Robert Baer
- Re: schematics and PCB design software. what's best?
- From: Joerg
- schematics and PCB design software. what's best?
- Prev by Date: Re: Glueing PCB's Together
- Next by Date: Re: WTF ! MIT to eliminate power cords ?
- Previous by thread: Re: schematics and PCB design software. what's best?
- Next by thread: Re: schematics and PCB design software. what's best?
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|