Re: OT: Spam filters
- From: krw <krw@xxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 10 Jun 2007 21:09:46 -0400
In article <jC%ai.13423$2v1.12000@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
krw wrote:
In article <17%ai.13418$2v1.10893@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
krw wrote:
In article <Fu_ai.7576$u56.4153@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>,
notthisjoergsch@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx says...
john@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
On 8 Jun, 21:35, Joerg <notthisjoerg...@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Has anyone figured out how to "un-train" a spam filter when it becomes
too strict? Mine now catches all email from a certain project, despite
the fact that the sender is in the address book and junk mail controls
are set to exclude any email from senders that are.
--
Regards, Joerg
http://www.analogconsultants.com
I gave up on useless filters so now pay a small amount each month for
spam filtering at my ISP. Have not seen a single item of spam in 15
months.
So perfect, I'm now suspecting that each email is manually read before
forwarding!.
I'll look into that but could only do it if they send the spam marked
for an automatic path to the waste basket. I need to be able to look
because there will be the occasional miscatch.
My ISP marks spam with a tag. I then filter that into the
wastebasket. I manually empty the wastebasket (about 2000 spams)
once a week. My ISP only misses about 1# of the spam, so it's not
all that hard to manually sort that. Oh, I also have a few filters
to filter out anything with funny characters in the subject line.
That sounds good, I'll have to inquire. As long as they send everything
it'll be fine. Some spammers became really good, they concoct subject
lines that sound like they are from an engineer. Such as "DA converter
problem" and stuff like that.
They offer two options, throw spam away at the ISP or have it tagged
and also allow user filters at the server. Their tag is *very* good.
They must do something other than look at the contents so I use it
along with filters to eliminate things like Chinese, at the server.
Why I can't have stuff they catch as well as set my own filters at
the server, I don't know.
Since you seem to be on an AT&T server that might work for me as well. I
am one of those legacy customers on the old Pacific Bell domain which
now belongs to AT&T.
My email is, yes. It's the AT&T Business Internet service (not ATT
Worldnet); http://www.attglobal.net/. AT&T bought me from ibm.net in
2000, or so. Dunno about high-speed Internet from them though. I
use my cable company for connectivity.
A phenomenon I don't quite understand is
subject and text in Russian. Maybe there are enough Russian speakers in
the US that 0.1% of recipients can read it. Of which 0.001% would ever
do so, meaning they probably hope that at least one of them will take a
glimpse. What a sad life.
Why Chinese? I can't read Unicode.
I wouldn't be able to filter that out because some of my clients produce
in China. Emails from there can contain Chinese sections, especially if
I am copied on a problem they tried to solve internally at first.
In the subject?
--
Keith
.
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: OT: Spam filters
- From: Joerg
- Re: OT: Spam filters
- References:
- OT: Spam filters
- From: Joerg
- Re: OT: Spam filters
- From: john
- Re: OT: Spam filters
- From: Joerg
- Re: OT: Spam filters
- From: krw
- Re: OT: Spam filters
- From: Joerg
- Re: OT: Spam filters
- From: krw
- Re: OT: Spam filters
- From: Joerg
- OT: Spam filters
- Prev by Date: Re: Turning an E Core Power Transformer into a Tattoo Gun
- Next by Date: Re: voltage sag when switching on circuit
- Previous by thread: Re: OT: Spam filters
- Next by thread: Re: OT: Spam filters
- Index(es):
Relevant Pages
|